Skip to main content

A beautiful GitOps day - Build your self-hosted Kubernetes cluster

·5 mins
Use GitOps workflow for building a production grade on-premise Kubernetes cluster on cheap VPS provider, with complete CI/CD πŸŽ‰

The goal 🎯 #

This guide is mainly intended for any developers or some SRE who want to build a Kubernetes cluster that respect following conditions:

  1. On-Premise management (The Hard Way), so no vendor lock in to any managed Kubernetes provider (KaaS/CaaS)
  2. Hosted on affordable VPS provider (Hetzner), with strong Terraform support, allowing GitOps principles
  3. High Availability with cloud Load Balancer, resilient storage and DB with replication, allowing automatic upgrades or maintenance without any downtime for production apps
  4. Include complete monitoring, logging and tracing stacks
  5. Complete CI/CD pipeline
  6. Budget target ~$60/month for complete cluster with all above tools, can be far less if no need for HA, CI or monitoring features

What you’ll learn πŸ“š #

  • Use Terraform to manage your infrastructure, for both cloud provider and Kubernetes, following the GitOps principles
  • How to set up an On-Premise resilient Kubernetes cluster, from the ground up, with automatic upgrades and reboot
  • Use K3s as lightweight Kubernetes distribution
  • Use Traefik as ingress controller, combined to cert-manager for distributed SSL certificates, and secured access attempt to our cluster through Hetzner Load Balancer
  • Use Longhorn as resilient storage, installed to dedicated storage nodes pool and volumes, include PVC incremental backups to S3
  • Install and configure data stateful components as PostgreSQL and Redis clusters to specific nodes pool via well-known Bitnami Helms
  • Test our resilient storage with some No Code apps, as n8n and nocodb, managed by Flux
  • Complete monitoring and logging stack with Prometheus, Grafana, Loki
  • Mount a complete self-hosted CI pipeline with the lightweight Gitea + Concourse CI combo
  • Test above CI tools with a sample .NET API app, using database cluster, with automatic CD using Flux
  • Integrate the app to our monitoring stack with OpenTelemetry, and use Tempo for distributed tracing
  • Go further with SonarQube for Continuous Inspection on code quality, including automatic code coverage reports
  • Do some load testing scenarios with k6 and frontend SPA sample deployment using the .NET API.

You probably don’t need Kubernetes πŸͺ§ #

All of this is of course overkill for any personal usage, and is only intended for learning purpose or getting a low-cost semi-pro grade K3s cluster.

Docker Swarm is probably the best solution for 99% of people that need a simple container orchestration system. Swarm stays an officially supported project, as it’s built in into the Docker Engine, even if we shouldn’t expect any new features.

I wrote a complete dedicated 2022 guide here that explains all steps in order to have a semi-pro grade Swarm cluster (but no GitOps oriented, using only Portainer UI).

Cluster Architecture 🏘️ #

Here are the node pools that we’ll need for a complete self-hosted Kubernetes cluster, where each node pool is scalable independently:

Node poolDescription
controllerThe control planes nodes, use at least 3 or any greater odd number (when etcd) for HA kube API server
workerWorkers for your production/staging stateless apps
storageDedicated nodes for running Longhorn for resilient storage and DB, in case you won’t use managed databases
monitorWorkers dedicated for monitoring, optional
runnerWorkers dedicated for CI/CD pipelines execution, optional

Here a HA architecture sample with replicated storage (via Longhorn) and PostgreSQL DB (controllers, monitoring and runners are excluded for simplicity):

flowchart TB client((Client)) client -- Port 80 + 443 --> lb{LB} lb{LB} lb -- Port 80 --> worker-01 lb -- Port 80 --> worker-02 lb -- Port 80 --> worker-03 subgraph worker-01 direction TB traefik-01{Traefik} app-01([My App replica 1]) traefik-01 --> app-01 end subgraph worker-02 direction TB traefik-02{Traefik} app-02([My App replica 2]) traefik-02 --> app-02 end subgraph worker-03 direction TB traefik-03{Traefik} app-03([My App replica 3]) traefik-03 --> app-03 end overlay(Overlay network) worker-01 --> overlay worker-02 --> overlay worker-03 --> overlay overlay --> db-primary overlay --> db-read db-primary((Primary SVC)) db-primary -- Port 5432 --> storage-01 db-read((Read SVC)) db-read -- Port 5432 --> storage-02 db-read -- Port 5432 --> storage-03 subgraph storage-01 direction TB pg-primary([PostgreSQL primary]) longhorn-01[(Longhorn
volume)] pg-primary --> longhorn-01 end subgraph storage-02 direction TB pg-replica-01([PostgreSQL replica 1]) longhorn-02[(Longhorn
volume)] pg-replica-01 --> longhorn-02 end subgraph storage-03 direction TB pg-replica-02([PostgreSQL replica 2]) longhorn-03[(Longhorn
volume)] pg-replica-02 --> longhorn-03 end db-streaming(Streaming replication) storage-01 --> db-streaming storage-02 --> db-streaming storage-03 --> db-streaming

Cloud provider choice ☁️ #

As a HA Kubernetes cluster can be quickly expensive, a good cloud provider is an essential part.

After testing many providers, as Digital Ocean, Vultr, Linode, Civo, OVH, Scaleway, it seems like Hetzner is very well suited in my opinion:

  • Very competitive price for middle-range performance (plan only around $6 for 2 CPU/4 GB for each node)
  • No frills, just the basics, VMs, block volumes, load balancer, firewall, and that’s it
  • Nice UI + efficient CLI tool
  • Official strong Terraform support, so GitOps ready

Please let me know in below comments if you have other better suggestions !

Final cost estimate πŸ’° #

Server NameTypeQuantityUnit Price
workerLB115.39
manager-0xCX211 or 3 for HA cluster0.5 + 4.85
worker-0xCX212 or 30.5 + 4.85
storage-0xCX212 for HA database0.5 + 4.85
monitor-0xCX2110.5 + 4.85
runner-0xCX2110.5 + 4.85

€0.5 is for primary IPs.

We will also need some expendable block volumes for our storage nodes. Let’s start with 20 GB, 2*0.88.

(5.39+8*(0.5+4.85)+2*0.88)*1.2 = €59.94 / month

We targeted €60/month for a minimal working CI/CD cluster, so we are good !

You can also prefer to take 2 larger cx31 worker nodes (8 GB RAM) instead of 3 smaller ones, which will optimize resource usage, so:

(5.39+7*0.5+5*4.85+2*9.2+2*0.88)*1.2 = €63.96 / month

For an HA cluster, you’ll need to put 2 more cx21 controllers, so €72.78 (for 3 small workers option) or €76.80 / month (for 2 big workers option).

Let’s party πŸŽ‰ #

Enough talk, let’s go Charles !